Low attentional engagement makes attention network activity susceptible to emotional interference

Authors:

• Robert T. Knight

• Kaisa M. Hartikainen

• Keith H. Ogawa

• Natasha Pickard

• Anne-Kristin Solbakk

• Verónica Mäki-Marttu

Date: 2014

DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000223

PubMed: 4162342

View PDF

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to investigate whether emotion–attention interaction depends on attentional engagement. To investigate emotional modulation of attention network activation, we used a functional MRI paradigm consisting of a visuospatial attention task with either frequent (high-engagement) or infrequent (low-engagement) targets and intermittent emotional or neutral distractors. The attention task recruited a bilateral frontoparietal network with no emotional interference on network activation when the attentional engagement was high. In contrast, when the attentional engagement was low, the unpleasant stimuli interfered with the activation of the frontoparietal attention network, especially in the right hemisphere. This study provides novel evidence for low attentional engagement making attention control network activation susceptible to emotional interference.

Orbitofrontal cortex biases attention to emotional events

Authors:

• Kaisa M. Hartikainen

• Keith H. Ogawa

• Robert T. Knight

Date: 2012

PubMed: 22413757

View PDF

Abstract:

We examined the role of orbitofrontal (OF) cortex in regulating emotion-attention interaction and the balance between involuntary and voluntary attention allocation. We studied patients with OF lesion applying reaction time (RT) and event-related potential (ERP) measures in a lateralized visual discrimination task with novel task-irrelevant affective pictures (unpleasant, pleasant, or neutral) preceding a neutral target. This allowed for comparing the effects of automatic attention allocation to emotional versus neutral stimuli on subsequent voluntary attention allocation to target stimuli. N2-P3a and N2-P3b ERP components served as measures of involuntary and voluntary attention allocation correspondingly. Enhanced N2-P3a amplitudes to emotional distractors and reduced N2-P3b amplitudes to targets preceded by emotional distractors were observed in healthy subjects, suggesting automatic emotional orienting interfered with subsequent voluntary orienting. OF patients showed an opposite pattern with tendency towards reduced N2-P3a responses to emotional distractors, suggesting impaired automatic orienting to emotional stimuli due to orbitofrontal damage. Enhanced N2-P3b responses to targets preceded by any affective distractor were observed in OF patients, suggesting bias towards voluntary target-related attention allocation due to orbitofrontal lesion. Behavioral evidence indicated that left visual field (LVF) attention performance was modulated by emotional stimuli. Specifically, OF patients responded faster to LVF targets subsequent to pleasant emotional distractors. We suggest that damage to the orbitofrontal circuitry leads to dysbalance between voluntary and involuntary attention allocation in the context of affective distractors with predisposition to posterior target-related processing over frontal novelty and affect-related processing. Furthermore, we suggest that orbitofrontal influence on emotion-attention interaction is valence and hemisphere dependent.

Trees over forests: Unpleasant stimuli compete for attention with global stimuli

Authors:

• Kaisa M. Hartikainen

• Keith H. Ogawa

• Robert T. Knight

Date: 2010

DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328336eeb3

PubMed: 20168261

View PDF

Abstract:

Whether emotional distracters call for attentional resources has been discussed in several studies. We have earlier shown that brief unpleasant distracters captured right hemisphere (RH) attentional resources as evidenced with reduced event-related potential responses and increased reaction times to nonemotional left visual field/RH targets. The aim of this study was to investigate whether emotional distracters selectively interfere with processes predominantly relying on the RH such as processing global visual features. Evoked potentials were recorded from 18 participants carrying out a visual discrimination task engaging global RH and local left hemisphere-dependent processes. Unpleasant distracters reduced global target detection-related right parietal activity. We conclude that brief unpleasant distracters compete for RH attentional resources with global level processing.

Emotionally arousing stimuli compete with attention to the left hemispace

Authors:

• Kaisa M. Hartikainen

• Keith H. Ogawa

• Maryam Soltani

• Robert T. Knight

Date: 2007

PubMed: 18007189

View PDF

Abstract:

Rapid interaction of the emotional and attentional networks is critical for adaptive behavior. Here, we examined the effects of emotional stimulation on hemifield attention allocation using event-related potential and behavioral measures. Participants performed a visual-discrimination task on nonemotional targets presented randomly in the left or right hemifield. A brief task-irrelevant emotional (pleasant or unpleasant; 150-ms duration) or neutral picture was presented centrally 350 ms before the next target (150-ms duration). Unpleasant stimuli interfered with the left visual field attention capacity, slowing behavioral responses to attended left field stimuli. In keeping with the behavioral data, event-related potential responses to nonemotional attended left field stimuli were reduced over the right parietal regions when preceded by an unpleasant event. The results provide electrophysiological and behavioral evidence that unpleasant, emotionally arousing stimuli interfere with the right hemisphere-dependent attention capacity.

Lateral and orbital prefrontal cortex contributions to attention

Authors:

• Kaisa M. Hartikainen

• Robert T. Knight

Date: 2003

View PDF

Effects of emotional stimuli on event-related potentials and reaction times in orbitofrontal patients

Authors:

• Kaisa M. Hartikainen

• Keith H. Ogawa

• Maryam Soltani

• Robert T. Knight

Date: 2001

View PDF

Abstract:

We examined the effects of bilateral orbitofrontal damage on emotional processing and hemispheric attention capacity. Participants (four bilateral orbitofrontal patients and age- matched controls) discriminated between upright and inverted triangles (target). Targets were randomly presented in the left (LVF) or right visual hemifield (RVF, 150 ms). Emotional (pleasant or unpleasant; 150 ms) or neutral stimuli were presented centrally 350 ms prior to the target. Pleasant stimuli decreased whereas unpleasant stimuli increased RTs to LVF targets, with exaggerated effects in patients. Orbitofrontal damage differentially altered processing of emotional stimuli. In addition, orbitofrontal patients showed altered target ERPs, with evidence of increased activity over frontal sites for only LVF targets. The results suggest an interplay between orbitofrontal cortex and the right hemisphere.

Transient interference of right hemisphere function due to automatic emotional processing

Authors:

• Kaisa M. Hartikainen

• Keith H. Ogawa

• Robert T. Knight

Date: 2000

PubMed: 11074080

View PDF

Abstract:

We examined the effects of emotional stimuli on right and left hemisphere detection performance in a hemifield visual discrimination task. A group of 18 healthy subjects were asked to discriminate between upright and inverted triangles (target). Targets were randomly presented in the left or right visual hemifield (150 ms target duration). A brief emotional picture (pleasant or unpleasant; 150 ms stimulus duration) or neutral picture selected from the International Affective Picture System was randomly presented either in the same (47%) or the opposite (47%) spatial location to the subsequent target. Emotional or neutral stimuli offset 150 ms prior to the subsequent target. Subjects were instructed to ignore the pictures and respond to the targets as quickly and accurately as possible. Independent of field of presentation, emotional stimuli prolonged reaction times (PB 0.01) to LVF targets, with unpleasant stimuli showing a greater effect than pleasant stimuli. The current study shows that brief emotional stimuli selectively impair right hemispheric visual discrimination capacity. The findings suggest automatic processing of emotional stimuli captures right hemispheric processing resources and transiently interferes with other right hemispheric functions.